Call Options Ratio for a Net Credit, Risk Profile, selling options, broken wing butterfly 2

http://www.expofutures.com
Call Ratio for a Net Credit Risk Profile, broken wing butterfly
Expo Futures and Options Trading
Tools for selling and writing options.
Applies to call and put options. Compare risk and rewards to other short option strategies. Example using Crude Oil, also applies to Gold and Currencies. Ask about corn, wheat, coffee, sugar, soybeans, natural gas, gasoline, heating oil, silver, platinum, copper, and all other liquid commodities. Skew Volatility and arbitrage applies.

Not a recommendation to buy or sell. Video for Educational purposes only. Speak to your licensed professional before investing. There is significant risk of loss in trading options and futures.

Duration : 0:6:12

Read the rest of this entry »

read comments (0)

3 Ways To Handle Losing Trades That Doom Us (From The Inside Out)

http://www.guerillastocktrading.com/stock-trading/shocking-confession-i-see-traders-murdered-because-they-cant-take-a-loss Whilst we’ve been kept awake at night wetting our sushi pajamas for horror of losing trades and jumping off our abode, nearly all losing trades come from misconceptions born inside our brains.

This is how the majority of losing trades go down:

1 – Double down. Whatever moron came up with this idea had to be a chap with a lot of money. The earliest hypothesis of doubling down must have come from some intoxicated well-off chap in Las Vegas playing at the MGM Grand Hotel and Casino. The hypothesis of doubling down is straightforward, if a stock you are hanging on to falls 20% in value, acquire double what you first bought. Over time, as poverty-stricken common folk got their hands on the theory, it changed into averaging down, meaning purchasing any extra amount of a stock that you are hanging on to when it drops 15 % or more.

Villainous stock trader Nick Leeson perfected the skill of averaging down into losing trades, or so he thought. This double down stock trading mastermind caused the collapse of Barings Bank, United Kingdom’s oldest investment bank, for which he was sent to jail.

Never fling good money after bad. Never risk more than you are seeking to gain.

2 – Value investing. This strategy must be the brain spawn of wicked institutional traders who hope the stupid common folk will help them in dumping their longs in a down trending stock market. The idea of value investing is straightforward, look at the P/E ratio. If the average P/E ratio for a sector, such as Tech, is 18 and you find a company with a P/E of 12, then you are buying this business at a deep markdown, a genuine valuation pearl, right? Not!

There is a reason a company has a P/E less than a industry arithmetic mean, institutional investors don’t like it as much as they are fond of other companies within the sector.

Nearly all valuation entry points involve buying a company that is within a downtrend. As a result, the majority of value investors buy low and sell even lower.

Never buy a business that is within a downtrend no matter how low the P/E ratio is.

3 – Cling to a losing stock trade until it eventually comes back. This is the intellectual retard strategy. People that do this have no business trading stocks. Their similar to that monkey that grabs the fruit and then the trap closes on the arm. If the monkey would let go of the fruit, he could run away from the trap. But the monkey just can’t let go.

Time is value, it is the material life is made of. Way back in March of 2000 the Nasdaq traded at 5,000. Today it trades at less than half that at 2186. So for the last 10 years, you are still waiting for the market to come back. These are 10 years you could have been investing and making money, eternally consumed. At only 10% a year, you could have doubled your money. But it’s worse than that.

The majority of retards that use this stratagem can’t do arithmetic. Let’s say the Nasdaq dropped from 5,000 down to 2,500 or 50%. The majority of monkey retards believe if the market goes up by 50% they’ll get back to break even. Not so. The stock market would have to go up 100% to get back to 5,000.

Never use buy and hold on a losing stock trade. Get rid of your losses as quickly as possible.

In the episode below I chat a little about the ridiculousness that is value investing.

Duration : 0:6:25

Read the rest of this entry »

read comments (2)

Day Trading – Best Day Trading Tools

http://www.ForexAutopilotRobot.com , Forex Robot That Is Capable Of Doubling Your Money Every Single Month. BIG Money Is Made NOT By Working Hard But By Working SMART! A trading forex robot is a software program that automatically enters and exits trades in the forex market with the intention of turning a profit. Many traders switch to these systems because they are tired of the hassle of manual trading. When trading manually you have to spend countless hours each day monitoring the market, and you also have to spend countless hours staying up to date on your current trades. A forex trading robot takes the hassle of out having to do this, but still allows you to take advantage of the income potential of the forex market. I would like to show you which robot is the best, but before that we should look at why this robot is the best.

Duration : 0:0:59

Read the rest of this entry »

read comments (0)

How do I get into a really good stock and/or trade system?

I prefer a system that works even on small investments.

you get into a really good stock by performing some due diligence or research. Also, watch CNBC.
Then again, if you are looking to get into a stock as a trade, there are penny promoters that spread news about stocks, and you can take a look to see how the stock is fairiing for a quick trade.
http://twitter.com/bullseyestox
Etrade.com
www.bullseyestox.com

read comments (3)

How much climate damage will the most recent US failure to pass a climate bill do?

As the Senate gave up on trying to pass a climate bill this year, the inevitable question is how much impact will this failure have on the climate?

Obviously it’s a difficult question because we don’t know what will happen in terms of policy in the future. It’s inevitable that at some point we’ll pass a climate bill. But with Republicans to gain Senate seats in November, it likely won’t happen until 2013 at the earliest. There’s also the possibility that Congress will find a way to remove the EPA’s mandate to regulate greenhouse gas emissions, although one such effort already failed, and this also seems unlikely.

Conveniently, the World Resources Institute just completed a study assessing how much the US can reduce emissions just with EPA and state regulations and emissions trading systems which are already in place or will be in the near future. They find that in comparison to a nationwide cap and trade system, EPA and state regulations will fall behind in terms of emissions cuts, but will almost catch up by 2016. But after 2016, they fail to keep up with the cuts in a national cap and trade system. By 2020 the climate bill was to reduce emissions 17%, whereas under EPA and state regulations, national emissions cuts are only 5-12% by 2020.
http://www.wri.org/publication/reducing-ghg-emissions-using-existing-federal-authorities-and-state-action

Then again, if we could begin implementing a national cap and trade system by around 2016, there wouldn’t be much difference compared to implementing the system now.

The other question is how this will impact international emissions cuts. It’s going to be hard for the Obama Administration to negotiate in international climate conferences when we know there won’t be a climate bill in the near future. He can only commit to the cuts that the EPA can make, which are less than a national cap and trade bill will make. So it’s possible that this failure will impact emissions cuts from many other countries as well. China, India, Australia, Canada, etc. may be less likely to cut their emissions without the US leading the way.

So there are a lot of variables involved, but what’s your guess – how much climate damage will the most recent US failure to pass a climate bill do?
Beam, maybe instead of making ignorant and irrelevant comments about ‘history’, you should study a little basic climate science.

The problem does not rest on any specific piece of legislation. The biggest hurdles are institutionalized government and human nature. There is not a single instance in all of human history where a societal-level group has done anything based on what it thought might happen beyond the current or next generation. The first concern of every national leader in the world is their personal political future. And in fairness to them, they are just a reflection of those they rule.

The greatest fear America’s founders had for the long-term future of the nation they had created was that, eventually, an ill-informed and intellectually disinterested public would elect politicians even more selfish and greedy than themselves.

“Remember, democracy never lasts long. It soon wastes, exhausts, and murders itself. There is never a democracy that did not commit suicide.” – John Adams

Unfortunately, we may be the living nightmare they were afraid of.

read comments (8)

Call Options Ratio for a Net Credit, Risk Profile, selling options, broken wing butterfly

http://www.expofutures.com
Call Ratio for a Net Credit Risk Profile, broken wing butterfly
Expo Futures and Options Trading
Tools for selling and writing options.
Applies to call and put options. Compare risk and rewards to other short option strategies. Example using Crude Oil, also applies to Gold and Currencies. Ask about corn, wheat, coffee, sugar, soybeans, natural gas, gasoline, heating oil, silver, platinum, copper, and all other liquid commodities. Skew Volatility and arbitrage applies.

Not a recommendation to buy or sell. Video for Educational purposes only. Speak to your licensed professional before investing. There is significant risk of loss in trading options and futures.

Duration : 0:6:12

Read the rest of this entry »

read comments (1)